Laboratorio de Sistemática & Biogeografía | J. Salvador Arias | e-mail


A sensistivity analysis for choosing reliability functions to select cladograms

J. Salvador Arias




Laboratorio de Sistemática y Biogeografía
Escuela de Biología
Universidad Industrial de Santander
A. A. 678 Bucaramanga, Colombia

e-mail: jsa@ciencias.uis.edu.co

Versión en español de esta página.

In this page are the additional results from the manuscript "A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR CHOOSING RELIABILITY FUNCTIONS TO SELECT CLADOGRAMS" writing with Daniel Miranda. If you have some coment or doubt about the mansucript or tables, or the table you want is not available, please write us an e-mail! We want to hear your opinions!

NEW: Click here to download manuscript PDF.

Here you could download the SOFTWARE (2->P, SF2/KoF, MK/KI) and MACROS for TNT (Yuu-PRC) used for the manuscript. And here the data matrices used.

ADITIONAL TABLES:

Click here to download a ZIP with all the tables and this navigation page.

Different measures
Table A1: NC average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=100, ArbRef=WD100)
Table A2: IC average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=100, ArbRef=WD100)
Table A3: IE average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=100, ArbRef=WD100)
Table A4: IA average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=100, ArbRef=WD100)
Table A5: MF average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=100, ArbRef=WD100)

Reference tree
Table A6: IC average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=100, ArbRef=variable)
Table A7: NC average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=100, ArbRef=variable)
Table A8: Nodes on optimal trees of each search
Table A9: Nodes average value on trees found on each replicate for 10 runs of each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=100)
Table A10: MF average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=100, ArbRef=variable)
Table A11: Distortion on optimal trees of each search
Table A12: Distortion average value on trees found on each replicate for 10 runs of each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=100)

Successive weights
Table A13: NC average value for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=20 (pesaje)/100 (sin pesaje), ArbRef=variable)
Table A14: Nodes on optimal tree of each succesive weight searche

Number of replicates
Table A15: IC average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=variable, ArbRef=WD100)
Table A16: NC average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=variable, ArbRef=WD100)
Table A17: MF average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=variable, ArbRef=WD100)
Table A18: IC and IE average values for 10 runs with each procedure without reference tree (jac cut=36%, reps=variable, ArbRef=no)
Table A19: MF average values for 10 runs with each procedure without reference tree (jac cut=36%, reps=variable, ArbRef=no)
Table A20: IC average variance for 10 runs with each procedurepara 10 corridas de cada procedimiento (jac cut=36%, reps=variable, ArbRef=WD100)
Table A21: NC average variance for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=variable, ArbRef=WD100)
Table A22: MF average variance for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=variable, ArbRef=WD100)

Effect of support
Table A23: IC average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=var, reps=100, ArbRef=WD100)
Table A24: NC average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=var, reps=100, ArbRef=WD100)
Table A25: MF average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=var, reps=100, ArbRef=WD100)

Fast searches
Table A26: NC average values for 10 runs with each procedure (jac cut=36%, reps=20, ArbRef=GFS)


NEW Actualization 7 december 2005: new PDF
3 december 2005: new PDF, links updated.
28 october 2005: Two new tables, new PDF with references to Web tables
17 octubre 2005: new PDF
15 October 2005: english page uploaded
11 October 2005: page unploaded

Laboratorio de Sistemática y Biogeografía | J. Salvador Arias | Correo electrónico